⚡ Economic Choice of Conductor Size

Interactive simulation of Kelvin's Law for transmission and distribution systems

Electrical Engineering • Power Transmission & Distribution

⚙️ System Parameters

Aluminium ≈ 0.0282 Typical value
Adjust the parameters and press Calculate.
OPTIMUM AREA
--
mm²
EQUIVALENT DIAMETER
--
mm
LINE CURRENT
--
A
MIN. ANNUAL COST
--
₹/year

📐 Kelvin's Law

Annual Cost = Annual Fixed Cost + Annual Energy Loss Cost

C(A) = K₁A + K₂/A

At the economic conductor size:
Annual Fixed Cost = Annual Energy Loss Cost

Therefore,
Aopt = √(K₂ / K₁)

Kelvin's law states that the most economical conductor size is obtained when the annual cost of the energy lost in the conductor is equal to the annual fixed charges on the conductor.

📊 Annual Cost vs Conductor Cross-Sectional Area

Conductor fixed cost
Energy loss cost
Total annual cost
Optimum point

🔌 Physical Meaning of Kelvin's Law

Conductor
Size changes according to optimum cross-section

📈 Larger Conductor

Increasing conductor area increases the initial investment and therefore increases annual fixed charges.

🔥 Smaller Conductor

Smaller area gives higher resistance. Therefore, I²R losses and annual energy-loss cost increase.

⚖️ Economic Size

The optimum size is where the combined annual cost reaches its minimum.

💰 Cost Breakdown at Optimum Size

Annual Fixed Cost ₹0
Annual Energy Loss Cost ₹0
Total Annual Cost ₹0

📋 Comparison of Different Conductor Sizes

Area
(mm²)
Resistance
(Ω)
Annual Fixed Cost
(₹)
Loss Cost
(₹)
Total Annual Cost
(₹)
Status

🧮 Calculation Details

Three-phase line current:
I = P / (√3 × V × cosφ)

Conductor resistance:
R = ρL / (A × n)

Three-phase copper/aluminium loss:
Ploss = 3I²R

Annual energy loss cost:
Closs = Ploss × operating hours × energy tariff

Conductor capital cost:
Ccapital = 3 × n × A × L × conductor cost

Annual fixed charge:
Cfixed = Ccapital × fixed-charge rate